CRO breakdown of CoCard Payments' 0% credit card processing lead generation page. Expert fintech conversion analysis by Apexure.
What is ConvertScore™? ConvertScore™ is Apexure's proprietary landing page performance metric. We evaluate every page across four dimensions — Copy & Messaging, Layout & Hierarchy, Trust & Social Proof, and CTA & Conversion Path — to produce a single score out of 100.
Every small business owner who accepts credit cards monitors their processing fees. It’s one of the more frustrating operating costs — not because it’s enormous, but because it compounds invisibly. A 2.5% processing rate on £30,000 monthly card volume is £9,000 per year leaving the business for a service that the business has no choice but to use.
CoCard’s headline — “INTRODUCING 0% Credit Card Processing” — is one of those rare positioning statements that doesn’t need a supporting sentence to create impact. The audience immediately does the maths. The “Introducing” framing also positions the page as presenting something genuinely new rather than a marginal improvement on existing services.
The trust signals flanking the hero are well-chosen: a star rating visible near the top right, and “Try It Free” and “No Fee” badges communicate risk-free access. For a merchant evaluating a switch from an existing processor, “no fee” and “free trial” remove the two biggest practical objections before the visitor has even read the comparison table.
The “Why Choose CoCard Processing Over Traditional Processing?” comparison table runs the visitor through a direct feature-by-feature evaluation. CoCard wins on processing fees (0% vs 2–3%), monthly fees (none vs monthly minimum), contract terms (flexible vs long-term contracts), and hardware costs. The table format is persuasive for a B2B buyer who wants to make a structured decision rather than an emotional one — it gives them the analysis pre-built. They don’t have to shop around; CoCard has done the comparison for them.
The “How Does It Work?” section breaks the switch to CoCard into four stages — contact them, they review your account, receive your equipment, start processing. For merchants anxious about the disruption of changing processors (new hardware, training staff, potential downtime), this four-step map removes the ambiguity. The process looks simple because CoCard has designed it to be. Showing it in four steps communicates that CoCard has thought through the merchant’s operational concerns.
The savings calculator mid-page — with inputs for monthly processing volume and current rate — produces a personalised monthly savings figure. Showing “$553” as an example output with the user input of “$25,000” volume demonstrates the calculator’s output before the visitor has entered their own numbers. That preview makes the calculator’s value immediately obvious and prompts the visitor to input their actual figures.
The “Companies That Already Use CoCard” section with a horizontal logos strip provides the social proof that merchants evaluating a new payment processor need most: evidence that other real businesses trust the service with their payments infrastructure. For a category where reliability is critical — a processor outage means no sales — seeing established company logos signals that CoCard has proven itself at scale.
The "Keep More Profits" section with three metrics — 57 businesses, $5 million saved, $553 average monthly savings — gives the savings claim the social proof layer it needs. '0% processing' is a promise; '$5 million saved' is evidence that the promise has been fulfilled at scale. The combination of both makes the claim credible rather than aspirational.
“57 businesses, $5 million saved, $553 average monthly saving” provides a specific, verifiable proof of performance. Each number addresses a different concern: 57 businesses shows adoption, $5 million shows scale, $553 shows individual impact.
The video testimonial section gives merchants a human face to the CoCard experience. For a service where the merchant relationship is ongoing, seeing a real business owner speak to their CoCard experience is significantly more persuasive than written testimonials.
The FAQ accordion addresses the specific questions a cautious merchant asks: what is a surcharge programme, how does it apply to sales tax, how quickly does the deposit arrive. These are practical questions that prevent sign-up if left unanswered. Resolving them on the page means the consultation call can focus on specifics rather than basics.
"Payment processing pages must handle the surcharge model question before the visitor asks it. '0% processing' is only possible when the processing cost is passed to the card user as a surcharge — which is legal in most US states but needs explaining. The FAQ section on CoCard's page addresses this transparently. Transparency about the mechanism builds more trust than avoiding the question."
The primary CTA — “Free Consultation” — drives to a consultation request rather than a self-serve sign-up, which is correct for a payment processing service where account setup requires review of the merchant’s current processor, transaction volume, and hardware situation. The “Free” framing removes the cost anxiety while “Consultation” positions the next step as advice rather than sales pressure.
The mobile app mockup near the bottom — showing the CoCard app interface with processing data — addresses the “but how will I manage this day-to-day?” question for merchants considering a switch.
Positioning the CTA as "Are You Ready to Start Saving on Processing Costs?" near the close reframes the decision as one the merchant has already made intellectually — they just need to take the action to implement it. That framing — you've already decided, now act — is a conversion technique that works particularly well when the page has already built a strong logical case, as this one has.
The 0% surcharge model isn’t legal in every US state (notably Connecticut and Massachusetts restrict it). A brief note clarifying which states are eligible — or an eligibility checker widget — would reduce wasted consultation calls from ineligible merchants and build trust with eligible ones by showing transparency.
Moving a simplified version of the savings calculator into the hero — just processing volume input and an instant estimate — would allow visitors to see their personal savings figure before they’ve scrolled the page. A visitor who sees “Your estimated monthly savings: $480” in the hero is highly motivated to read the rest of the page.
“Restaurants, retail stores, and service businesses are already saving with CoCard” — with specific category breakdowns — would help merchants self-identify and feel confident the service handles their industry’s payment patterns. Category specificity in B2B fintech consistently improves conversion rates.
CoCard scores 81 because the 0% positioning is maximally differentiated, the comparison table is well-structured, the savings calculator creates personalised financial proof, and the testimonials and company logos provide genuine social validation. The score sits at 81 rather than higher because the surcharge model transparency could be more prominently handled in the body copy, the hero calculator is absent, and merchant category specificity isn’t surfaced. These are each testable improvements that would sharpen conversion without requiring a page rebuild.
Browse more fintech and payment services examples in our landing page examples gallery. For related reading, see our guide to lead generation landing page design.
People feel losses more strongly than gains. Framing around what they will miss motivates action.
This principle influences visitor behaviour and supports the page's conversion goal.
People follow the actions of others. Testimonials, reviews, and client logos build trust and reduce hesitation.
People trust credible experts. Certifications, awards, media mentions, and expert endorsements boost credibility.
Giving something valuable first (free guide, tool, audit) creates an obligation to reciprocate.
Small business owners who accept card payments know exactly how much they're paying in processing fees — it's a visible line item every month. '0% Credit Card Processing' in the hero is a direct financial promise to an audience that quantifies the cost impact immediately. A business processing £25,000 per month at 2.5% is paying £625/month in fees. '0%' means that £625 stays in the business. The claim doesn't need to explain the mechanism — the financial implication is understood by the target audience before any copy is read.
A savings calculator converts the abstract '0% processing' claim into a specific personal number that each visitor can calculate for their own business. 'You could save £553 per month' is dramatically more persuasive than 'businesses save thousands on processing fees' — because it's about this visitor's business specifically. The calculator also creates engagement: a visitor who inputs their processing volume has actively participated in the page, which increases psychological investment and conversion intent. Time spent on the calculator correlates directly with conversion likelihood.
Payment processing comparison tables convert best when they compare against a familiar, named category rather than a specific competitor. 'CoCard vs Traditional Processing' works because every merchant knows what traditional processing costs and has experienced its limitations. The comparison should focus on fee structure, contract terms, hardware costs, and settlement speed — the four variables merchants care most about. Showing zero processing fees, no monthly minimums, and next-day funding against the traditional alternatives converts the comparison into a straightforward decision for cost-conscious business owners.
Payment processing consultation requests typically convert to active accounts within 1–3 weeks, depending on the merchant's current contract terms and hardware situation. The consultation call allows a CoCard representative to calculate the specific savings for that merchant's processing volume, explain the surcharge model that enables 0% fees, and walk through the onboarding process. Merchants who see their personalised savings figure on the call convert at significantly higher rates than those who only saw the calculator on the landing page — which is why the page's primary CTA correctly drives to consultation rather than a self-serve sign-up.
We design high-converting landing pages for B2B and B2C brands. Let's talk about yours.
Get a Free Consultation Or browse more examples →
Founder & CEO of Apexure, Waseem worked in London's Financial Industry. He has worked on trading floors in BNP Paribas and Trafigura, developing complex business systems. Waseem loves working with Startups and combines data and design to create improved User Experiences.
Get quality posts covering insights into Conversion Rate Optimisation, Landing Pages and great design
"Payment processing landing pages convert best when they make the financial case before anything else. A small business owner evaluating processors is doing one calculation: how much will this save me versus what I pay now? CoCard leads with the most direct possible answer to that calculation — zero. Everything else on the page is support documentation for that single claim."