Building your own CRM means having a customer relationship management system written around your business’s own workflow, hosted in your name, with no per-seat licence, instead of renting a platform and adapting your business to its shape. Five years ago that was only sensible for large companies. In 2026 it is a realistic option for an owner-run business with a small team, and this post is about deciding whether it is the right one for yours.

We are writing it from both sides. Apexure ran on HubSpot for years. We were paying about $600 a month, plus $200 a month for every extra seat, and using a fraction of it. So we replaced it with a system of our own: contacts, companies, deals, quotes, a support inbox, time tracking and a two-way sync with Xero. It has run the business since. Then clients started asking for the same thing, and we now build custom CRMs for them. We also still set up HubSpot and build landing pages in it, so we know what it does well.

The businesses that ask us this question

Five businesses asked us for a custom CRM in one quarter this year, and every one gave the same reason. They were paying enterprise software prices for one pipeline and one form.

A glass manufacturer whose Google Ads agency had suggested Salesforce for two users. A founder with no CRM at all who found HubSpot too complex and too expensive to start on. An agency owner leaving GoHighLevel because the contact records were full of fields nobody could explain. A director paying over a thousand pounds a month for HubSpot and using, by his own estimate, ten percent of it.

None of them had a software problem. They had a fit problem. The platform was built for a marketing and sales team that would use the hubs it paid for, on a budget that expected per-seat pricing. They were an owner, two salespeople and an accounts person, quoting from a spreadsheet and following up from memory.

What HubSpot costs in 2026

The list prices are public and worth writing down, because the monthly figure hides the three-year one.

HubSpot Sales Hub Professional is $90 per seat per month on an annual plan, or $100 per seat billed monthly, with a one-time onboarding fee of $1,500. Sales reps need full seats; support staff can use core seats at around $45 to $50 a month. Marketing Hub, Service Hub and contact tiers are priced separately.

That is not an outrageous number for a team that uses the product. It is an outrageous number for a team that uses one pipeline and one form, which is the team that calls us. If you are that team and HubSpot is merely set up badly, the cheapest fix is to strip it back, and our HubSpot alternative page explains when we recommend exactly that rather than a build.

Platform or build: the honest comparison

The row that decides most cases is fit. A platform gives you objects called Contacts, Companies and Deals and asks you to run your business through them. That works when your business sells the way the platform assumes. It does not work when your price depends on dimensions, material and who is asking, or when a job passes through six people before it is invoiced, or when the report you need on a Monday morning does not exist in any tier.

What “build your own” means in 2026

It does not mean an owner writing code at weekends. It means a specification written from how the business actually works, a small team building it in code with modern tooling, and the result running on infrastructure in the business’s name.

The specification is where the value is. When we built a quoting engine for a US manufacturer that sells under two brands, the pricing lived in a spreadsheet that had grown for years: 376 products, three customer tiers, rules for every option. Writing that down as a specification the owner could check was most of the project. The quoting software page tells that story in more detail. The build then followed the specification, and the follow-ups that used to depend on memory now go out at seven, fourteen and twenty-eight days.

The other thing a build means is ownership. The code, the hosting and the data are in your name. If you fall out with your developer, you hire another one. There is no per-seat licence and no platform you cannot leave.

When you should stay on a platform

We would be poor advisers if every answer were a build. Stay on HubSpot, or move to Pipedrive, Zoho or Close, when any of these is true.

If you are leaving GoHighLevel rather than HubSpot, the same logic applies, and our GoHighLevel alternative page covers it from that side. We run a GHL agency, so we will tell you when GHL is the right tool.

The part most comparisons miss: what happens to the leads

Whichever way you go, the CRM is only one part of the system that turns a click into a customer. The website form has to land in it. The tracking has to record the enquiry once, with the campaign that produced it. The follow-up has to go out when nobody books. And the won deal has to go back to the ad platform so the next month’s budget is spent on the campaigns that produced revenue rather than form fills.

We build the CRM as one rung of that ladder, alongside the website, the conversion tracking and the follow-up, and the whole thing is described on our conversion systems page. A CRM chosen on price alone, platform or build, and left disconnected from the rest is the most expensive option of all.

Build your own CRM FAQs

GoHighLevel costs $97, $297 or $497 a month, depending on whether you want three sub-accounts, unlimited sub-accounts, or the right to resell the platform under your own brand. That is the easy part. The part that decides what you actually pay is everything metered on top: phone numbers, texts, calls, email, AI and premium workflow steps, each billed at rates HighLevel publishes in its help centre and almost nobody reads before signing up.

We run a GoHighLevel agency practice and build on the platform every month. We also build CRMs that businesses own outright for people who have outgrown it. So we have no reason to talk the price up or down. This post lays out the plans, every usage rate with the date HighLevel last updated it, four worked bills, and which plan we would put you on.

The plans and what each one includes

HighLevel sells three published plans and a negotiated Enterprise tier. The fee is per agency account. You can add as many users as you like on any of them, which is the single biggest difference from HubSpot or Salesforce, where every seat costs money.

“All core features” is a long list: contacts and pipelines, funnel and website builder, calendars and booking, forms and surveys, email and SMS campaigns, workflow automation, reputation management, memberships and courses, and reporting. Starter has all of it. The higher tiers do not unlock features so much as unlock ways of running other people’s accounts and charging them.

Two smaller things worth knowing before the trial. The trial is 14 days on whichever plan you pick, billing starts automatically when it ends, and HighLevel’s own pricing page says usage charges for phone and third-party services can apply during the trial. And annual billing is exactly ten months’ worth, so it is a two-month discount rather than a different price.

The usage charges, line by line

HighLevel is honest about this in one sentence on its pricing page: the subscription covers platform features, and telecommunications and AI are billed on usage. The rates live in separate help articles. Here they are together, with the date each article was last updated.

Segments matter more than the rate. A text is one segment up to 160 characters, or 70 if it contains an emoji or a curly apostrophe pasted from a document. A friendly two-sentence appointment reminder with a link is often two segments, so a “500 texts a month” estimate can be 1,000 segments on the bill.

How the AI is priced

There are three ways to pay for HighLevel’s AI, and since 20 May 2026 the pay-per-use option has been priced in parts. The right one depends on call volume per location, not on the size of your agency.

AI Employee Growth is $50 a month per sub-account and includes 1,000 Conversation AI responses, 100 Voice AI minutes, unlimited Reviews AI and Content AI, and 100 managed agent runs. AI Employee Unlimited is $97 a month per sub-account with no caps on conversation or voice and three times the Ask AI and AI Studio allowance. Pay-per-use bills each component: for Voice AI that is $0.045 a minute for the engine, $0.015 a minute for an OpenAI or Cartesia voice (up to $0.170 for ElevenLabs V3), the model’s tokens at $0.05 to $3.00 per million, and the phone minutes for the call.

Put together, a three-minute inbound call answered by Voice AI with a standard voice comes to roughly 22 cents before tokens and the 5%: $0.135 for the engine, $0.045 for the voice and $0.035 for the call. At that rate the $97 Unlimited plan pays for itself at about 450 such calls a month for one location. Below that, Growth or pay-per-use is cheaper. Above it, buy Unlimited and stop counting.

Four worked bills

Rates are only useful once they are multiplied by something. These four are the shapes we see most often, priced at the rates above. Your numbers will differ, but the ratio between the plan fee and the usage is the thing to take away.

One local business on Starter. Starter at $97. One local number, $1.15. Sole-proprietor A2P registration, $24.50 once and $2 a month. 800 texts a month (500 sent, 300 received) at $0.01047 with carrier fees, $8.38. 500 call minutes (300 out, 200 in), $7.31. Five per cent on the phone lines, $0.84. 5,000 emails, $3.38. Usage comes to about $23 a month, so the bill is roughly $120 a month and $1,465 in year one.

A small business that actually uses the phone system, AI and automations, on Starter. Starter at $97. Two numbers, $2.30. Low-volume standard A2P, $24.50 once and $10 a month. 4,500 texts, $47.12. 2,500 call minutes with recording, $42.80. Five per cent on the phone lines, $4.61. 30,000 emails, $20.25. AI Employee Growth, $50. Premium workflow Starter tier, $10. Usage comes to about $187 a month, nearly twice the plan fee, for a bill of roughly $285 a month and $3,435 in year one.

An agency with ten clients on Unlimited. Unlimited at $297. Each client’s usage looks like the first example, around $23 a month, and Unlimited lets the agency rebill it at cost, so the agency’s own bill is the plan fee: $3,564 a year. If the agency absorbs usage instead of rebilling, add about $230 a month and ten A2P registrations, which takes the year to roughly $6,600.

A SaaS-mode agency on Agency Pro with ten clients. Agency Pro at $497. AI Employee Unlimited on every sub-account, $970. The white-label mobile app, $497. That is $1,964 a month and $23,568 a year before any usage, all of it designed to be resold with markup. Whether it pays depends entirely on the SaaS price: at $297 a month per client, the agency bills $35,640 a year against that cost base, and every extra client on the same plan is mostly margin.

Which plan, honestly

For one business, Starter. The three sub-account limit only bites if you run separate brands or locations that need their own numbers and pipelines, and even then the second and third are included. There is nothing in Unlimited a single business needs.

For an agency, Unlimited as soon as you have a fourth client. The maths is not subtle: $297 with unlimited accounts against $97 with three. Rebilling at cost matters more than it sounds, because a client who sends 4,000 texts a month is otherwise spending your margin.

Agency Pro is for reselling, full stop. If you intend to sell GoHighLevel to clients as your own software, with your own plans and checkout, you need SaaS Mode and the markup rebilling, and the extra $200 a month is trivial next to the revenue. If you deliver services and simply want more accounts, you do not need it, and the reporting alone is an expensive reason to pay the difference.

Is it worth it, and when it is not

For an agency that uses most of the platform, GoHighLevel is cheap. Ten client accounts with pipelines, funnels, calendars, texting and automation for $297 a month, with no per-user charge, is not something HubSpot or Salesforce can match; five seats of HubSpot Sales Hub Professional alone come to about $17,700 over three years at 2026 list prices, as we worked through in our post on building your own CRM.

For a single business the picture is different, and it is the one we are asked about most. Take the first worked bill. Three years on Starter is about $4,350 for a rented account, most of which is buying a phone system, a funnel builder, a course platform and a reputation tool. If the business uses all of that, it is a bargain. If it uses one pipeline, one form and a booking calendar, the plan fee is shelf space, and the usage line, the part that does the work, would cost roughly the same on any provider.

That is the point at which we stop recommending a plan and ask what the business is actually running. Sometimes the answer is a two-day tidy-up on the account they have, and our GHL team does that. Sometimes, particularly for businesses that quote with options and need their accounts software in sync, the answer is a system built around their workflow with no platform fee at all. We say which in writing, with the three-year numbers beside each option.

GoHighLevel pricing FAQs

A healthcare landing page has a harder job than almost any other page we build. The visitor is not comparing software features or picking a font for a wedding invitation. They are worried about their teeth, their mood, their child’s safety or a test result, and they are deciding whether to trust a stranger with it. Every example below was designed by our team, and each one had to solve that trust problem before it could ask for a booking.

We have built more than 3,000 landing pages since 2015, and healthcare is one of our largest sectors: dental clinics, mental health providers, aesthetic practices, testing labs, care agencies and consumer health brands. This post walks through twelve of those pages, grouped by the kind of patient they serve, and explains the design decision that does the most work on each one. If you would rather see the pages first, our gallery of landing page examples has a CRO breakdown for every one of them.

What makes healthcare landing pages different

Three things change when the product is a treatment rather than a purchase.

The visitor is emotionally loaded. A parent looking for residential mental health care, an executor arranging a probate service, a woman weighing a cosmetic procedure. The emotional temperature is high and the decision is large. Pages that open with clinical features or a discount code misread the moment.

Trust has to be earned in the first screen. Patients have learned to be sceptical of medical marketing. Named clinicians, accreditation marks, patient videos and honest pricing do more than any amount of persuasive copy. Stock photography of smiling models does the opposite.

Claims are regulated. In the UK the Advertising Standards Authority and the CAP Code restrict what a treatment page can promise. In the US the Federal Trade Commission and state boards do the same. That constraint is useful. It forces the page to prove rather than to promise, which is what nervous patients respond to anyway.

Keep those three in mind and the twelve pages below start to look less like twelve designs and more like twelve answers to the same question.

Dental landing page examples

Dental is where we see the widest gap between the clinic’s view of the treatment and the patient’s. The clinic sees a routine procedure. The patient sees cost, pain and the risk of a result that does not match the photos.

1. Brighton Implant Clinic: trust before technology

Dental implants are high-cost, high-anxiety and high-consideration. The average patient researches for weeks, compares several clinics and quietly wonders whether the outcome will match what they have seen online. By the time they reach this page, they are not short of information. They are short of confidence.

The Brighton Implant Clinic page is built around that gap. The headline, “Dental Implant Technology That You Can Trust”, speaks to the anxiety rather than the procedure. Before-and-after photography, patient video testimonials and an icon benefit bar follow in an order that answers the patient’s questions as they occur. The page offers two ways to act, a form and a phone number, because implant patients often want to speak to a person before they commit to a consultation.

The clinic’s director, Bruno Silva, left us a Google review that reads simply: “great team of people that help my business do well.” That is the test for a page like this. It has to work for the patient and for the practice.

2. Cosmetic Dental: reframing the price comparison

Cosmetic Dental is an Auckland implant clinic competing against two alternatives at once: local dentists at full New Zealand pricing, and overseas dental tourism at headline-cheap prices that hide the cost of remediation and travel. The visitor has usually priced both before they arrive.

The Cosmetic Dental page refuses to fight either comparison on its own terms. The headline, “Get 30% Off High Quality Dental Implants Without The Overseas Risk”, collapses both into one sentence: cheaper than the local default, safer than the overseas one. A form sits on the banner, the process is numbered, and the FAQs are open rather than hidden behind accordions, because an anxious patient should not have to click to find out what happens next.

3. Burst Oral Care: a click-through page for cold traffic

Not every healthcare page is for a clinic. Burst sells electric toothbrushes, and the Burst Oral Care click-through page receives visitors who were interrupted by an ad. Their default state is scepticism and the page has a few seconds to justify itself.

The dark, high-contrast hero signals a premium product rather than a generic supplement template. The headline, “Brush with help from 30+ Dental Professionals”, borrows clinical authority for a consumer product in seven words. A press logo bar and a comparison table do the rest, and the yellow call to action is the only bright element on the screen, so the eye lands on it without being told to.

Dental and mental health pages from the gallery

Brighton Implant Clinic

Healthcare Lead Generation

Cosmetic Dental

Healthcare Lead Generation

Burst Oral Care

Healthcare Click-Through

Dr. TMS Therapy

Healthcare Lead Generation

AMFM

Healthcare Lead Generation

Headway

Healthcare Lead Generation

Browse all 300+ examples →

Mental health landing page examples

Mental health pages carry the heaviest emotional load in this list. The design job is to be calm, specific and honest, and to make the first step feel small.

4. Dr. TMS Therapy: speaking to the patient who has already been let down

Dr. TMS Therapy treats patients for whom antidepressants have not worked. These are not first-time patients. They have engaged with the healthcare system and been disappointed, and they arrive with a specific mix of hope and scepticism.

The Dr. TMS Therapy page acknowledges the failure of medication without dismissing it, presents TMS as a clinical alternative with data behind it, and makes the first step, reserving a seat at an information session, feel manageable. A scarcity counter on the session is one of the few places we use urgency in healthcare, and it works here because the sessions are genuinely limited.

Co-founder Nate Griffith’s Clutch review of the project was one line: “They’re always willing to help to make things perfect.” On a page like this, perfect means nothing that could add to the visitor’s doubt.

5. AMFM: calm words for a crisis

When someone lands on a residential mental health treatment page, they are often in crisis or close to it. They may be a parent searching for help for a child or a spouse who has run out of options.

The AMFM page keeps its headline plain: “Full Residential Mental Health Treatment for Long-Term Recovery.” Each word is doing a job. “Full” signals a complete service, “Residential” names the type of care, and “Long-Term Recovery” frames the outcome rather than the process. A sticky header keeps the call-back request within reach at every scroll depth, because the moment a family decides to act should not require them to hunt for a button.

6. Headway: recruiting clinicians, not patients

Healthcare landing pages are not always aimed at patients. Headway connects psychiatric providers with patients and needed to recruit licensed psychiatric mental health nurse practitioners who wanted to run an independent practice without the administrative burden.

The Headway recruiting page sells autonomy and support in the same breath: clinical independence, with billing and paperwork handled. The visual language is closer to a software product than a clinic, which suits an audience of professionals evaluating a career move. Headway’s marketing operations lead, Hajar Zaki, summarised the engagement in her Clutch review as “Apexure is a super responsive team!”

Clinic, aesthetics and testing pages

These pages serve patients who have already decided they want the treatment or the test. The question has moved from “should I?” to “who should I trust?”

7. Skin Master: leading with the pricing table

Laser hair removal sits between healthcare and aesthetics. The clinic has to signal medical credibility while communicating a cosmetic result and managing price anxiety in a market where quotes vary wildly.

The Skin Master pricing page does something most clinics avoid: it puts the pricing table on the page. Beside it sit before-and-after photos, an embedded Google review widget, a section on the technology used and a comparison with other treatments. The visitor who arrives has already decided they want the treatment. The page’s only job is to answer “why this clinic?”, and transparent pricing is the most persuasive answer available.

8. The Transform Clinic: evidence for an elective decision

Fat reduction is a highly considered decision that touches appearance, safety, money and time. The Transform Clinic page opens with the positioning “Scientifically Proven Non-Invasive Fat Reduction”, which separates it immediately from the unregulated end of the aesthetics market. The rest of the page follows the order in which a patient’s objections arrive: is it safe, is it credible, what will I actually look like, and how small is the first step. The answer to the last one is a free consultation, which is the right ask for a treatment nobody buys on the first visit.

9. DM6 Labs: urgency without pressure

DM6 Labs provided rapid COVID-19 testing across Canadian locations, mostly to travellers who needed certified results before a flight. These visitors have high intent and a hard deadline. They are not browsing.

The DM6 Labs page mirrors that state. Pricing and turnaround times are visible within the first scroll, the booking action is immediate, and the brand and accreditation marks sit where a nervous traveller will see them. Allan Maltsev at DM6 described the working relationship in a Google review: “Apexure has met all goals, timelines, and have ultimately grown to be an extension of our team.” For a page that had to change as testing rules changed, that mattered as much as the launch design.

Consumer health and care pages

The last group sells to people, not patients: health-curious consumers, families comparing insurance alternatives and caregivers who have run out of ordinary options.

10. Beek Health: selling agency, not a test

Preventive testing sits in an awkward place. People know they should get tested and most do not. The gap is friction and cost opacity, not information.

The Beek Health page leads with “Take Control of Your Health with Our Annual Lab Test.” It is not selling a test. It is selling agency, the sense that the visitor can understand their own body on their own terms. The price sits in a pricing box near the top, the test panel is laid out as a grid so the value is visible, and the call to action is “Order Now” because there is no consultation to book. This is a consumer purchase and the page treats it as one.

11. Knew Health: explaining a category before selling it

Most visitors to the Knew Health page have never heard of medical cost sharing. The page had to explain the category and persuade the visitor it beats what they have, at the same time. Our answer was a comparison table set against conventional insurance, an accordion FAQ for the objections that follow, and two calls to action for two states of readiness: see my package for the convinced, learn more for everyone else. It is one of the highest-scoring pages in our gallery, and the comparison table is why.

12. Safe Place Bedding: validating the caregiver first

Safe Place Bedding is a family-owned Ohio manufacturer of specialty beds for children and adults with severe autism, epilepsy or dementia. The visitor is almost never the patient. It is a parent or carer who has spent years padding floors and visiting emergency rooms before typing the search that brought them here.

The Safe Place Bedding page sequences validation before product. The headline, “Specialty Beds for Those Who Need Them Most”, tells the caregiver they are in the right place. A “From Our Family To Yours” founder section turns a manufacturer into people, the FAQs are open, and the form sits on the banner because the visitor has usually already decided and needs a quote, not a pitch.

Clinic, testing and consumer health pages from the gallery

Skin Master

Healthcare Pricing Page

The Transform Clinic

Healthcare Lead Generation

DM6 Labs

Healthcare Click-Through

Beek Health

Healthcare Lead Generation

Knew Health

Healthcare Lead Generation

Safe Place Bedding

Healthcare Lead Generation

Browse all 300+ examples →

What these twelve pages have in common

Read the twelve together and the same decisions keep appearing.

That last point is the one clinics resist most, because a website that only does one thing feels like a waste. The result below is what happens when a page is allowed to do one thing for the right traffic.

Radicle Science’s clinical-trial enrolment page is an outlier, and it depends on unusually well qualified traffic. The lesson transfers even so. The page has no navigation, one form, and every section exists to remove a reason not to enrol. You can read how it was built in the Radicle Science case study, and compare your own numbers against the sector medians in our landing page conversion rate benchmarks by industry.

Those two services live at dentist landing pages and chiropractic landing pages. For any other specialty, the landing page design service covers how we research, design and build a page, and what it costs.

Healthcare landing page FAQs

Key takeaways

• Pipedrive is a sales pipeline tool. HubSpot Sales Hub is one part of a platform where marketing, sales and service share a record. That difference explains most of the price gap and most of the complaints about each.
• At September 2026 list prices Pipedrive runs $14 to $79 a seat a month billed annually. HubSpot Sales Hub runs $20, $90 and from $150, plus a required one-time onboarding fee of $1,500 on Professional and $3,500 on Enterprise.
• Five seats for two years: $1,680 on Pipedrive Lite, $2,400 on HubSpot Starter, $4,680 on Pipedrive Growth, $12,300 on HubSpot Professional once onboarding is in.
• The bill turns on two things nobody puts on the pricing page: who counts as a seat, and which add-on or top-up your workflow forces. HubSpot's view-only seats are free; Pipedrive bills every seat and sells $50 packs for more automations, reports and custom fields.
• If your process fits a standard pipeline, one of these will do. If quoting, accounts and ad tracking have to be one record, or you are buying seats for people who only read, the third option is a CRM built around your workflow that you own.

Most comparisons of these two end with “it depends on your needs”, which is true and useless. This one ends with numbers. Below are the September 2026 prices from both vendors’ own pages, the fees and limits that actually move the bill, two worked bills for a five-person team, and a plain description of the situation where neither is the right answer. We build CRMs, so we have a stake in that last part, and we say so where it matters.

In short

Pipedrive is a sales pipeline tool priced from $14 to $79 a seat a month billed annually, with no free plan and a 14-day trial. HubSpot Sales Hub is the sales part of a wider platform, priced at $20, $90 and from $150 a seat, with a free CRM for two users and a required one-time onboarding fee of $1,500 on Professional. For a small team that only needs a pipeline, Pipedrive costs less at every tier. For a business that wants marketing, sales and service on one record, HubSpot is the platform built for that, and you pay for the platform whether you use all of it or not.

What each one is, in the vendors’ own words

The two companies agree on the framing. Pipedrive’s comparison page says the biggest difference is complexity: HubSpot offers more features and functionality, Pipedrive a simpler, more focused tool. HubSpot’s page makes the same point from the other side, listing AI agents, native data enrichment, multi-touch attribution and journey analytics as things it has and Pipedrive lacks. Neither is wrong.

So the first question is not which is better. It is which shape of product you are buying. Pipedrive sells seats on a pipeline and charges for extras around it. HubSpot sells access to a platform in which the CRM is the shared record for marketing, sales, service and content, and its Sales Hub prices reflect that even if sales is all you use.

That matters because most of the businesses that call us are not choosing between the two from scratch. They are already on one, usually HubSpot, paying for a platform and using a pipeline. The question they are really asking is whether to move down to something simpler, or out to something built for them.

The 2026 price list, seat by seat

Both vendors quote per seat per month. Both discount for annual billing. The figures below are the annual-billing rates in US dollars as published on 4 September 2026, with the monthly-billing rate where the vendor shows one.

Two things on that table are easy to miss. HubSpot’s Starter price is a promotion at the moment: the page shows $7 with $20 struck through and a banner offering up to 65 percent off for new customers, so the number you renew at is $20. And Pipedrive’s Premium tier went up: its own pricing data marks the current $59 annual rate as taking effect on 1 October 2025, which is why guides written before then can still quote a lower figure.

Five seats, two years: the worked bills

A team of five who all sell, everyone on the same plan, billed annually, no add-ons. Twenty-four months at the published seat rate, plus the onboarding fee where HubSpot requires one.

Read from the bottom up. HubSpot Sales Hub Professional is $10,800 in seats plus $1,500 to be onboarded, so $12,300, and the onboarding is not optional. Pipedrive Premium, its closest match on features, is $7,080. Pipedrive Growth, which is where most five-person sales teams actually land, is $4,680. HubSpot Starter is $2,400 at list, and less than that in year one on the current offer, but it holds you to two deal pipelines and Starter’s core seats, which is fine until it is not.

Double the team to ten and the gap widens in cash terms: $9,360 for Pipedrive Growth against $23,100 for HubSpot Professional, and the HubSpot figure still assumes nobody needs Marketing Hub, no extra credits, and no Enterprise features.

Now change one assumption. Say three of the five only look at reports. On HubSpot they become view-only seats at no cost, so Professional drops to two paid seats: $4,320 plus onboarding, $5,820. On Pipedrive every seat is billed whether it is assigned or not, so Growth stays at $4,680. The two are suddenly close, and the platform with the bigger sticker is the cheaper one for a team where most people watch rather than sell. This is why the seat count, not the tier, is the first thing to get right.

The limits and fees that decide it

Two of those rows do most of the work. The first is the one-time fee. HubSpot’s page states, in the price footnote, that the cost shown does not include the required onboarding: $1,500 on Professional, $3,500 on Enterprise. It is a real cost, it lands in month one, and it is the reason a HubSpot Professional bill for a small team starts with a four-figure invoice before anyone has logged in. Pipedrive charges nothing of the kind and says implementation help is free on any plan over $400 a year, which is every plan with more than a couple of seats.

The second is where the ceilings are. Pipedrive’s restructured plans introduced limits that the old Enterprise tier did not have: Ultimate is now capped at 500 custom fields, 500 reports a user, and 25 teams, visibility groups or permission sets, in Pipedrive’s own words, to keep the platform stable and performant. Below Ultimate the caps are lower, and the way past them is a top-up pack. The pricing page’s data lists packs for automations, reports and custom fields at $50 a month each from Growth upwards, leads and deals or API tokens at $100, and a custom fields pack that only appeared on 1 July 2026. A team that builds a lot of automation can find the $39 seat has a $150 shadow.

HubSpot’s ceilings are shaped differently. Pipelines go 1, 2, 15, 100 by tier; workflows up to 300 on Starter and 1,000 above; sequences 5,000 per account. The soft limit is credits: each tier includes a bundle (500, 3,000, 5,000) that AI features and data enrichment consume, and more cost $9 per 1,000 paid annually. The hard limit is that anything outside sales lives in another hub with its own seats.

And then there are the add-ons. Pipedrive’s LeadBooster (chatbot, live chat, web forms, prospector) and Smart Docs (quotes, proposals, e-signatures) are paid extras on Lite and Growth, from $32.50 a month billed annually, and included on Premium and Ultimate. Campaigns, its email marketing, is priced per contact and works out at about $16 a month for the first 1,000. So a Growth team that wants web forms and proposals is paying $39 plus two add-ons, at which point Premium at $59 is the better buy. This is not a trick; it is how tiers are designed. It is just worth doing the sum before you assume the cheaper seat is the cheaper plan.

How to choose in a week

Step one is the one people skip and the one that decides everything after it. A page describing your actual workflow, with the awkward lines marked, is what turns a demo into a test. We have watched teams pick a platform on the strength of a beautiful reporting screen and then spend a year exporting to a spreadsheet because the quote step did not fit. The reporting was never the problem.

When neither fits

We would be poor advisers if the answer were always a build. If your sales process fits a standard pipeline, your team uses most of what it pays for and the bill is proportionate, stay on the platform you have or move to the cheaper one. HubSpot and Pipedrive are good products for the businesses they were designed for. The businesses they were not designed for tend to recognise themselves in this list.

Two or more of those and the third option is worth pricing: a CRM built around your workflow that you own, with quoting from your own price book, two-way sync with your accounts software, and tracking that sends closed deals back to the ad platform. It is a one-time build plus hosting, in your name, and adding a user costs nothing. We wrote up what building one involves and how the quote-to-cash process should run so you can judge it against the two bills above, and we would rather tell you to stay on Pipedrive at $39 a seat than build something you do not need.

HubSpot vs Pipedrive FAQs

Professional services are the hardest thing to sell on a single page, because there is nothing to show. A law firm, a recruiter or a consultancy is selling judgment, and the buyer usually needs it at a stressful moment, at a price they cannot see, from people they have never met. The twelve pages below were all designed by our team for firms in exactly that position, and each one had to find a way to make a stranger’s expertise feel safe to buy.

We have built landing pages for law firms, accountancies, executive search firms, IT consultancies and advisers since 2015, and the pattern is consistent enough that we now start every professional services brief with the same three questions: what is the buyer afraid of, what is the smallest first step they will accept, and what proof would make them believe this firm has solved their exact problem before. Read the examples with those questions in mind. If you want to browse first, every page is in our landing page examples gallery with a CRO breakdown.

What makes professional services pages different

The buyer is anxious about commitment, not about the product. Nobody lands on a probate page unsure whether probate exists. They are unsure what it will cost, how long it will take and whether calling means they are trapped. Pages that leave those questions open lose the visitor to the next tab.

Price is usually invisible, which makes any price a weapon. A flat fee, a stated hourly rate or even “the first call is free and lasts fifteen minutes” converts better than “contact us for a quote”, because it answers the question the visitor is most afraid to ask.

Expertise has to be shown, not claimed. Every competitor says they are experienced, client-focused and results-driven. Named clients, quantified case results, accreditation marks and a founder with relevant history are the only things a sceptical buyer cannot dismiss.

Law firm landing page examples

Legal is the largest professional services sector in our gallery, and the pages split into two kinds: the visitor in crisis and the visitor making a considered decision. The design has to know which one it is talking to.

1. Alix: a fixed fee for a grieving executor

Alix is a US flat-fee probate service that bundles a probate attorney, a CPA and a coordinator into one fixed-price engagement, replacing the hourly-billed attorney model. The visitor is typically the executor of a parent’s or spouse’s estate, two to four weeks after the loss, grieving, time-poor and afraid of being exploited.

The Alix page treats that visitor as an adult making a procurement decision under stress rather than as someone to be consoled. A six-step multi-step form asks small questions one at a time, customer quote cards show people who were in the same position, and accordion tabs hold the detail for those who want it. The fixed fee is the page’s central argument. It removes the fear that makes people put off calling a lawyer for weeks.

2. Shakfeh Law: a defined first step for a considered buyer

Contract review is an underserved niche. The person who needs a contract reviewed is not in crisis. They have a job offer, a vendor agreement or a property deal, a deadline, and enough legal knowledge to know they do not have enough.

The barrier on the Shakfeh Law page is commitment anxiety: the fear that calling a law firm opens an undefined financial and time commitment. So the page defines the commitment. Numbered process steps show exactly what happens, a multi-step form starts the review, and the call to action says “Start Your Contract Review” rather than “Contact Us”. Attorney Danya Shakfeh’s Google review afterwards: “The team knows exactly what they are doing and the process and communication was very smooth.”

3. SmithLaw: giving the visitor permission to take her claim seriously

Pregnancy discrimination is under-litigated for a psychological reason. Women who have experienced it often minimise what happened. The legal barrier is not awareness. It is permission.

The SmithLaw page opens with an empathy-first hero, puts the attorney’s photograph where the visitor will see it, lists what counts as discrimination as a checklist so the visitor can recognise her own experience, and makes the phone number prominent because this is a conversation people want to have with a person. The free consultation is the ask, and it is repeated without ever becoming pushy. Benjamin Smith, the firm’s head attorney, wrote in his Clutch review that “the system they have in place is meticulously designed to cater efficiently to their clients’ needs.”

4. AMF Elder Law: three answers in one headline

Families searching for an elder law attorney are usually in a stressful situation: a parent needs care, assets are at risk, the Medicaid application is complex and unforgiving. They need to know within seconds that this firm does exactly this.

The AMF Elder Law page answers with one headline: “Qualify for Medicaid. Protect Your Assets. Free Consultation.” Outcome, benefit and the removal of the financial barrier in eight words. A sticky header keeps the consultation request in view, and the rest of the page is clean and short because the visitor has no patience left for reading.

5. Tax Law Advocates: credentials before copy

People searching for IRS tax relief are frightened and, because the sector has enough bad actors, deeply distrustful of anyone offering help. The barrier is not finding the right firm. It is trusting any firm.

The Tax Law Advocates page puts its BBB A+ and BCA AAA ratings in the header, above the headline, before a single sentence of persuasion. The multi-step form then asks about the tax situation in small, non-threatening steps and ends with a free consultation. It is one of the highest-scoring pages in our gallery because it understood that in this category, credibility has to arrive first.

6. Elite Practice: consulting for a once-in-a-lifetime decision

Elite Practice advises dentists who plan to sell their practice within one to five years and want to maximise the outcome. The visitor is a practice owner in their fifties or sixties with decades of wealth tied up in the business.

The Elite Practice page is long-form and scenario-driven, because the fee has to be justified against what a broker or a direct sale would produce. Dark layout, big typography, testimonials from dentists who have sold, and a single ask: schedule a free call. Nobody buys this on a first visit, and the page does not pretend otherwise.

Legal and advisory pages from the gallery

Alix

Legal Services Lead Generation

Shakfeh Law

Legal Lead Generation

SmithLaw

Legal Lead Generation

AMF Elder Law

Legal Lead Generation

Tax Law Advocates

Accounting Lead Generation

Elite Practice

Consulting Lead Generation

Browse all 300+ examples →

Recruiting and HR landing page examples

Recruiting pages sell to buyers under pressure from above. A short-staffed sales team is a revenue number that is not being hit, and the person on the page wants to know quickly whether this firm can solve it in their timeline.

7. Shortlist: answering the VP’s question in the first screen

A VP of Sales evaluating recruiting partners is not exploring. They want to know whether the firm can hire sales reps for them, now. The Shortlist page puts the form above the fold, a client logo wall beside it, a comparison table against in-house recruiting below, and a money-back guarantee where the objection about risk would otherwise form. It is the highest-scoring professional services page in our gallery because it never makes the visitor scroll to find out whether they are in the right place.

8. Wagepoint: removing every reason to hesitate

Wagepoint sells payroll to small Canadian businesses. The brief was not “build a landing page”. It was “remove every reason a Canadian small business owner would hesitate”. We found three: uncertainty about Canadian compliance, unfamiliarity with the brand, and the fear that switching payroll mid-year is complicated.

Every element on the Wagepoint page answers one of those three. Compliance is addressed in plain words, recognisable brand logos supply familiarity, and the switching process is laid out step by step. The call to action is a free trial, which is the lowest-commitment ask a software-backed service can make.

9. Riviera: a logo wall for an executive audience

Riviera places C-suite and senior leadership talent at technology and venture-backed companies. At that level the firm is not selling a recruiting service. It is selling access, judgment and a network that took years to build.

The Riviera page shows that positioning rather than stating it. A client logo wall carries most of the argument, success metrics make it concrete, and an inline lead form in a split layout keeps the ask visible without shouting. Executive search is one of the few services where the logo wall can do more work than the headline, and this page lets it.

Consulting and advisory landing page examples

Consulting buyers are experienced, sceptical and have heard every promise before. The pages that work for them lead with evidence and let the visual register match the seniority of the buyer.

10. ROCIMG: evidence over adjectives

ROCIMG is a technology and management consultancy in a market where every firm claims expertise, experience and client focus. The ROCIMG page skips the adjectives and leads with case studies, client names and a testimonial with specific outcomes. Three service cards keep the offer legible, industry sectors show the buyer that the firm has worked in their world, and the ask is deliberately soft, “Discover More About Us”, because a consulting mandate is never won on the first click.

11. Support Revolution: trust for a decision an IT director owns personally

Third-party support for Oracle and SAP has an unusual buyer psychology. The prospect already knows their vendor support costs too much. The question is which third party they trust with the central nervous system of their organisation, because if it goes wrong, the IT director who approved the switch owns the failure.

The Support Revolution page uses a dark, serious layout, video and a slider of proof to answer two questions at once: is this a credible provider, and what happens when something breaks. The call to action, “Tell Us About Your Project”, is a conversation opener rather than a sales trap, which is the right tone for a buyer who needs to be sure.

12. STENN: speed as the whole proposition

STENN provides trade finance to sophisticated buyers, CFOs and supply chain directors, whose banks either cannot lend in the geographies they operate in or cannot move fast enough. STENN’s claim is “supply chain finance in as little as 24 hours”.

The STENN page builds everything around that claim: dual-benefit cards, a stats bar, a news ticker banner that signals an active, credible operation, a short video explainer for a complex product and a minimal form because a CFO will not fill in twelve fields to request a consultation. In a sector where bank processes take weeks, the page makes speed visible.

Recruiting, consulting and finance pages from the gallery

Shortlist

Recruiting Lead Generation

Wagepoint

Recruiting Lead Generation

Riviera

Recruiting Lead Generation

ROCIMG

Technology Consulting Lead Generation

Support Revolution

Technology Consulting Click-Through

STENN

Consulting Lead Generation

Browse all 300+ examples →

What these twelve pages have in common

The fifth point is the one firms find hardest, and it is also the one that moves the numbers. The result below is from a bottom-of-funnel page we built for a UK renewables installer, a service business selling a high-ticket installation to homeowners who had already spoken to competitors.

Harry Haines at Cahill Renewables described it in his review: “The Apexure team built me a bottom-of-the-funnel landing page that converted above 4%, double the industry average. Likewise, they made the entire process simple by educating me the entire way through.” The page did one thing for one kind of visitor, and that is most of why it worked. You can compare your own rate against sector medians in our conversion rate benchmarks by industry.

We have written up the specific structures for several of these sectors: professional services landing pages, personal injury lawyer landing pages, legal landing pages and accountant landing pages. For anything else, the landing page design service explains how we research and build a page and what it costs.

Professional services landing page FAQs

Quote to cash is everything that happens between a customer asking “how much?” and the money for that sale sitting in your bank account, recorded against the right invoice. It sounds like a finance term. In practice it is a sales problem, because most of the revenue that goes missing between those two points goes missing in the middle: a quote that was never followed up, a price applied by hand, an invoice that did not match what was promised.

We build the systems that run this process for small and mid-sized businesses, most recently a quoting engine for a US manufacturer whose pricing lived in a forty-four-tab spreadsheet. This post explains the eight steps, what the software options cost at 2026 list prices, and the five places we see money leak when we are shown how a company quotes today.

What quote to cash means

Quote to cash, or QTC, is the chain of steps from configuring an offer for a customer, through pricing it, sending the quote, getting it accepted, processing and delivering the order, invoicing, collecting the payment and recording it. Salesforce’s own definition runs to the same eight stages and adds renewals for businesses that sell subscriptions.

The phrase matters because it forces the sales side and the accounts side to be looked at as one process. A company can have a good CRM and a good accounts package and still lose money between them, because the quote lives in one and the invoice in the other and a person carries the numbers across by hand. Quote to cash is the name for that whole path, and quote-to-cash software is any tool, or combination of tools, that runs it without the hand-carrying.

You will also see two neighbouring terms. Order to cash starts later, once an order exists, and covers fulfilment, invoicing and collection. Lead to cash starts earlier, at the first enquiry, and includes marketing attribution. Quote to cash sits between them, which is why it is the one that matters most for businesses whose sales depend on a quote being right.

The eight steps

Every business runs these steps whether it has named them or not. The version below is the one we map when we start a build, and the details under each step are where the problems usually sit.

Two of these steps decide most of the outcome. Step two, pricing, is where the rules live, and if those rules are in someone’s head or in a spreadsheet formula nobody dares edit, every later step inherits the risk. Step four, acceptance, is where the follow-up happens or does not. Salesforce cites research from Bidsketch that 66% of sales quotes end without a purchase. Some of those were never going to close. A meaningful share simply went quiet because nobody chased them on day seven.

Where the money leaks

When a business shows us how it quotes, the same five leaks appear often enough that we now look for them first.

None of these needs a large suite to fix. They need the quote, the order and the invoice to be one record, with the pricing rules written down once and applied by the system rather than by whoever is quoting that day.

The software options and what they cost

There are four kinds of tool that claim the quote-to-cash name, and they are not interchangeable. The prices below are 2026 list prices from each vendor’s pricing page, on annual billing where that is the published rate.

Seat prices look small until you multiply them. For a five-person team over three years, at list price and before any add-ons or price rises, the platform options come out like this.

The comparison is deliberately unfair to itself, because a Salesforce seat buys a CRM and a QuickBooks subscription buys an accounts system. That is the point. Most small businesses do not need one tool that does all eight steps. They need the two or three tools they already have to pass a quote between them without a person in the middle, and the question is whether an off-the-shelf quoting layer or a built one does that better for their pricing.

When to buy and when to build

We tell most businesses to buy. If a quote is a product, a quantity and a discount, QuickBooks estimates, PandaDoc or the quotes tool in your CRM will do the job at a subscription price, and a build would be money spent recreating something that exists. We say so in the first conversation.

A build earns its keep in three situations.

The price is a calculation, not a lookup. Width times height, plus the frame, times the customer tier, unless it is fire-rated. CPQ tools model this as bundles and discount schedules, and the translation never quite finishes, so the spreadsheet survives alongside the tool.

Two brands share one price book. The quote has to go out under the right name, from the right email domain, with the right terms, and land in one QuickBooks account. Platforms want two accounts and two bills.

The quote has to become the invoice untouched. Contact, address, line items, tax and shipping carried across in one click, and the paid invoice visible back on the quote. Most tools export a document. Fewer create a proper estimate in the accounts package, and fewer still bring the payment back.

If you recognise your business in one of those, our quoting software page explains how a build runs, from reading the spreadsheet to handover, and what you own at the end. The engine usually sits inside a custom CRM so that the enquiry, the quote, the follow-up and the invoice are one record, and closed quotes can feed conversion tracking so the ad account learns from revenue.

Quote to cash FAQs

Server-side tracking is a set-up where the tags that send data to Google Analytics, Google Ads, Meta and the rest run on a server you control instead of in the visitor’s browser. The page sends one request to a subdomain of your own site. The server decides what each platform receives, sets cookies from the server rather than from JavaScript, and forwards events to the ad platforms in the form they match best.

It is sold hard, usually with the line that cookies are going away. Some of that is true and some of it is out of date, so this post separates the two. We reconcile and fix conversion tracking for businesses whose GA4, ad platform and CRM disagree, and we do not run ads, so we have no reason to sell you a server you do not need. What follows is what it fixes, what it does not, how the set-up runs, and what Google Cloud and Stape charge for it in September 2026.

What server-side tracking is

In the usual set-up, Google Tag Manager runs in the browser. Every vendor you add, GA4, Google Ads, Meta, LinkedIn, Hotjar, loads its own script on the page, sets its own cookies, and sends its own requests to its own servers. The browser, and anything installed in it, can see and block each one.

Server-side tagging adds a second container that runs on a server. Google describes it as a way to “measure user activity wherever it happens” with the server running “in your own Google Cloud Platform project, or in a different environment of your choosing”, and the point that matters for data control: “only you have access to the data in the server until you choose to send it elsewhere.” The web container sends a single stream of events to that server, on a subdomain such as data.yourdomain.com, and tags inside the server container forward them to each vendor. The vendors’ scripts never load on the page.

That is the whole mechanism. Everything else, the cookie lifetimes, the ad-blocker resistance, the cleaner data, follows from where the request comes from and who sets the cookie.

Why it exists: the browser stopped cooperating

Safari is the reason most of this started. WebKit’s tracking prevention policy blocks all third-party cookies with no exceptions, deletes cookies created by JavaScript after seven days without a visit, and, when a visitor arrives through a link carrying a click identifier, caps those cookies at 24 hours. Since most analytics and advertising cookies are set by JavaScript, an iPhone visitor who clicks an ad on Monday and converts the following Tuesday is a new visitor by then, and the ad platform never learns it worked.

Chrome went a different way. After years of announcing that third-party cookies would go, Google said in April 2025 that it would not roll out a new prompt and would leave the choice in Chrome’s settings, and in October 2025 it retired most of the Privacy Sandbox technologies that were meant to replace them. So third-party cookies still work in Chrome for anyone who has not changed the default. The loss is concentrated in Safari, in iOS, and in browsers with blockers installed, which for a consumer business can be a large share of the traffic that matters.

Then there are the blockers themselves. A blocker that stops the Meta script from loading stops the Pixel; a request to your own subdomain looks like part of your site. That is where the “server-side gets around ad blockers” claim comes from, and it is partly right, which is the honest version.

What it fixes, and what it does not

Fixes, in rough order of value. A share of the events that blocked scripts and flaky connections were losing now arrive, because there is one request to your own domain instead of six to other people’s. Cookies set by the server in the HTTP response last longer in Safari than cookies set by JavaScript, with a caveat below. You decide what each vendor receives, which matters if you are in health, finance or law and would rather Meta did not see the form fields. The page loads fewer scripts. And the ad platforms get their preferred inputs, enhanced conversions and Conversions API events, from a reliable source.

The caveat is Safari’s rule on cloaked hosts. WebKit “detects third-party CNAME cloaking and third-party IP address cloaking requests and caps the expiry of any cookies set in the HTTP response to 7 days.” A tagging server on Google Cloud or Stape answers on your subdomain but from their servers, so Safari can still cap the cookie at seven days. Hosts sell workarounds; Stape’s is called Cookie Keeper and needs its Business plan. The cookie gain is real, but it is not the ninety-day cookie the sales page implies.

Now the list it does not fix, which is the list that costs businesses more. It does not remove consent. It does not make a form that fails to reach the CRM reach the CRM. It does not stop internal test submissions counting as leads. It does not change how HubSpot attributes by click time, or stop an attribution tool deleting a lead when it becomes a deal. It does not let Safari track a visitor across other people’s sites. And it does not decide, for you, which of three systems is the source of truth for a number.

Enhanced conversions and the Conversions API

These are the two things a server is most useful for, and they are often confused with it.

Google’s enhanced conversions for web send a hashed version of the first-party data the visitor typed into your form, “email addresses, name, home address, and/or phone number”, hashed with SHA-256 and matched to Google accounts that were signed in when they saw the ad. Google’s stated purpose is to “improve the accuracy of your conversion measurement and unlock more powerful bidding.” It can run from the browser; from a server it runs whether or not the Google Ads script loaded.

Meta’s Conversions API is the server-to-Meta channel. Meta’s own guidance is to “use the Conversions API in addition to the Meta Pixel, and share the same events using both tools”, because the API catches events “the Pixel may lose due to network connectivity issues or page loading errors.” To stop double counting, both must use the same event_name and carry either an event_id or an external_id with the browser cookie. Meta scores each event’s customer information as Event Match Quality, and only matched events are used for attribution and delivery optimisation; unmatched ones support basic measurement and nothing else. That is why the fields you send matter more than the channel you send them through.

Neither needs a tagging server. Enhanced conversions can run in the web container; Conversions API events can be sent from a CRM when a lead is created, which is how we usually do offline conversions. What the server adds is one place where both are configured, with the same event IDs, from a request the browser could not block.

How the set-up runs

Two practical notes. The subdomain is the piece people skip: without it the server is a third party too, and you lose most of the benefit. And keep the web container. Server-side tagging does not replace it; the web container is what sends the events to the server in the first place, and it is where consent is collected.

What it costs

The monthly hosting is the small part. The larger costs are the set-up, the reconciliation on either side of it, and the time someone spends keeping the container current when a vendor changes its tag.

For most small and mid-sized businesses the hosting line is $17 to $83 a month. The set-up is the real spend, and it is worth doing once, properly, with a reconciliation on either side so you can see what it recovered.

When to do it, and when to fix the form first

Server-side tracking FAQs

Website maintenance is the ongoing work of keeping a live site updated, secure, fast and correct: platform and plugin updates, security and backups, fixes when something breaks, content changes, and checks that the forms and tracking still work. Most businesses pay for it monthly, either as a retainer or as a block of hours, and most quotes leave out the one job that costs the most when it is skipped.

This guide covers what maintenance costs in 2026, what a fair price should include, the four ways it is sold, and how we price it at Apexure. We have looked after client sites for a decade, and the pattern in the enquiries we receive is consistent: the business is not unhappy about the price they were paying. They are unhappy that nobody answered when something broke.

What website maintenance costs in 2026

Published pricing guides agree more than you might expect. WebFX’s 2026 guide puts a typical small business site between $50 and $500 a month. GoDaddy’s guide frames the same spread as roughly $3,600 to $12,000 a year once hosting, updates, security and content changes are added together. Gravitate’s guide lands full-service plans for most small businesses at around $100 to $200 a month, with the price climbing quickly for anything with bookings, a shop or integrations.

The spread is not about who is cheap and who is expensive. It is about what the number includes. A $50 plan is hosting plus automatic updates. A $500 plan is a person who reads your site every month and fixes what they find. Both are called maintenance.

The ranges above are our reading of the published guides linked at the end of this post, combined with what we see in the plans we run. Treat them as a sanity check on a quote, not as a price list.

What the price should include

Maintenance is six jobs. A quote that covers four of them is not wrong, but you should know which two are missing before you sign.

That last job deserves its own paragraph. A plugin update that breaks a form does not always break it visibly. The page still loads, the submit button still works, and the enquiry goes nowhere. We have taken over sites where this had been the case for months. Our maintenance plans include a tracking check after every change for that reason, and if your numbers already disagree with each other, our conversion tracking service is where to start.

The four ways maintenance is sold

1. Hosting plus automatic updates

The cheapest option, often $20 to $60 a month, and what most managed hosting companies mean by maintenance. Updates run automatically, backups happen, and nobody looks at the site. Fine for a brochure site nobody changes. Risky for anything with forms, because automatic updates are what break them.

2. A monthly retainer

A fixed fee for a defined scope, usually on a six or twelve month contract. Predictable, and sensible for a busy site where change is constant. The weakness is quiet months: you pay the same when nothing happens, and the scope tends to be defined by what the supplier wants to do rather than what you need.

3. Hourly blocks

You buy a block of hours each month and the supplier reports how they were used. This is how we sell maintenance at Apexure. Plans start at ten hours a month at around $100 an hour, the rate drops at twenty, unused hours are visible in the monthly report, and there is no contract to be locked into. The advantage is that the hours can go on whatever the business needs that month: a fix, a landing page, a speed pass, a new lead magnet or a tracking repair.

4. An in-house person

The right answer for a large site with daily change. For a typical business site it is the most expensive option by a wide margin, because a salary buys far more hours than the site needs, and the person still cannot cover design, development and analytics on their own.

What ten hours a month actually buys

The most common question we get is whether ten hours is enough. For a typical business site, it is more than most businesses use, and at around $100 an hour it comes to roughly $1,000 a month. A representative month on one of our plans looks like this:

That leaves two hours in the block, and the report says so. The month after, those hours might go on a landing page for a campaign or on the conversion elements of the page that gets the most traffic. Once the firefighting stops, maintenance turns into small, steady improvement, which is where the return comes from.

One managed IT firm moved to us this year for a reason that had nothing to do with price. Their previous web team took three days to reply to anything, and the site’s forms had been sending enquiries to a mailbox nobody read. The first month’s hours went on fixing that. Every month since has gone on making the site better.

What drives the price up

If a quote comes in well above the ranges at the top of this post, one of these is usually why.

Red flags in a maintenance quote

When maintenance is not the answer

Some sites cannot be maintained into good shape. If the hours keep going on workarounds, the theme cannot be edited safely, the page speed is poor on mobile whatever you do, or the forms cannot connect to your CRM, you have reached the point where another year of patching costs more than a rebuild.

Our guide to how often you should redesign your website covers the signs, and our website redesign service explains what a rebuild involves and what it costs. Most of the redesigns we quote land between $5,000 and $18,000 and take four to eight weeks. Maintenance then becomes the top rung of the same ladder: the site we built, kept in the shape we built it in. The whole ladder is described on our conversion systems page.

Website maintenance cost FAQs

A website redesign checklist exists for one reason: a redesign changes everything at once, and the things that break are the things nobody wrote down. The design is the part everyone looks at. The URLs, the forms, the tracking tags and the CRM connection are the parts that decide whether the new site produces more leads than the old one or fewer.

This checklist has 40 checks in three phases. It is the list we run on our own website redesign projects, where the brief is always the same: make the site better without losing a single enquiry the old one was producing. Use it as a working document. Tick things off, argue with a few, and add the ones specific to your business.

Why redesigns lose leads

Three failures account for most of the damage we see when a business comes to us after a redesign has gone wrong.

Unmapped URLs. The old site had 300 pages. The new one has 60. Nobody mapped the other 240, so the backlinks, the rankings and the bookmarks now land on a 404 page. Traffic falls, and the redesign takes the blame.

Forms that send to the wrong place. The new contact form was tested by the developer, who received the test in their own inbox. The business never changed the recipient. Enquiries pile up somewhere nobody looks.

Tracking that was never rebuilt. GA4 was on the old site. The ad platform tag was on the old site. Neither was carried across, or both were, twice. The business has no idea whether the new site is working, and the decisions that follow are made on guesswork.

None of these is a design problem. All of them are checklist problems, which is why the first phase below is the longest.

Phase one: before you start

Everything in this phase is about recording the current state. You cannot protect what you have not measured.

Two of these deserve a note. The GA4 and CRM reconciliation (check nine) is the one businesses skip, and it matters because your baseline may be wrong. We have found sites reporting more than 150 conversions a month in GA4 where the CRM held 80 real leads. If you redesign against a false baseline, you will never know whether the new site worked. Our conversion tracking service exists for exactly this reconciliation.

The maintenance decision (check eleven) belongs before the platform decision, not after launch. Who will run updates, fix things and check the forms? If the answer is nobody yet, our guide to website maintenance costs explains what that should cost and include.

Phase two: during the build

The order matters more than people expect. Redirect mapping comes before design because the site map is the redirect map. Copy comes before visual design because a page designed around placeholder text gets rewritten to fit the boxes. Forms and tracking are built with the pages, not bolted on in the last week, because the last week is when they get forgotten.

For a fuller view of what happens after someone submits a form on the new site, and why we treat that as part of the redesign, see the conversion systems ladder. The redesign is the first rung; tracking, CRM and follow-up are the next three.

Phase three: after launch

Launch day is not the finish. The first thirty days are when the redirects prove themselves, the 404 log tells you what you missed, and the first platform update tests whether anyone is watching the forms. Check ten, re-running the form test after the first update, is the one we would keep if we could keep only one.

What good looks like

The result below is from a UK accountancy whose redesign we ran with the tracking and follow-up rebuilt alongside the site. The design changed, but the number that moved was the one recorded in phase one.

The pattern behind it is the pattern behind this checklist. The old site’s pages were mapped, the forms were rebuilt to land in the right place, the conversion events were named consistently, and the first month’s numbers were read against a baseline that had been checked. Everything else, the design, the copy, the platform, served that.

If you are still deciding whether a redesign is due, our guide to how often you should redesign your website for conversions covers the signs, and our guide to homepage design covers the page that carries most of the load.

Website redesign checklist FAQs

Not the colours. Not the logo. The promise. The visitor clicked because the ad made a specific claim, and the landing page broke that thread.

That started costing real money in late 2024. Meta deployed Andromeda, an AI system that now controls ad delivery for every Facebook and Instagram campaign. Andromeda watches what happens after the click. Visitors bouncing? Forms sitting empty? Page crawling on a 4G connection? It treats your landing page as evidence that the ad itself is not worth showing. Your CPM climbs. Your delivery shrinks. The landing page quietly became a bid-quality signal, and most advertisers have not caught up.

We have built Facebook ad landing pages across insurance, SaaS, B2B, health, and fintech. One of them, for Spark Advisor (a Medicare insurance FMO), converted at 13.47%. Another, for Affordable Health Coverage Today, hit 20%. The gap between those pages and the ones stuck at 2% has nothing to do with budget or audience size. It comes down to whether the page picks up where the ad left off.

This guide covers how to design, build, and optimise landing pages specifically for Facebook and Instagram ad traffic. Not search traffic. Not organic visitors. The audience that was halfway through a cooking video when your ad caught their eye.

Facebook Ads Landing Pages vs Google Ads Landing Pages

This is not a design preference. It is a psychology problem.

Someone searching Google typed “Medicare quotes online”, looked at three ads, and clicked yours. They showed up with a problem and a credit card. Your landing page just needs to get out of the way.

Someone on Facebook was watching a cooking video. Your ad interrupted them. They tapped because the image caught their eye or the headline made a promise they could not ignore. They did not ask to be on your page. They are not sure they want to be.

That gap changes everything about what the landing page needs to do.

How traffic temperature changes landing page design requirements for Facebook vs Google Ads

The table below summarises the core differences:

If you are running the same landing page for both Google and Facebook campaigns, one of them is underperforming. Platform-specific pages consistently outperform generic ones in our projects.

The 7 Elements Every Facebook Ads Landing Page Needs

Every Facebook landing page we have built that converts above benchmark uses the same seven building blocks. The specifics change by industry and offer. The structure does not.

The anatomy of a high-converting Facebook ads landing page

1. A Headline That Continues the Ad’s Story

Message match on Facebook landing pages is not just a UX principle. Meta’s Andromeda system performs semantic crawling of your destination URL and compares it to the ad creative. Pages where the headline diverges from the ad’s promise get delivery throttled.

The formula that works: [Outcome] + [Timeframe or qualifier]. If your ad says “Get 3 quotes in 60 seconds”, your landing page headline should not say “Welcome to our quote comparison service”. It should say “Compare 3 quotes in 60 seconds” or something semantically close.

We test headlines on every Facebook LP project. The pattern we see repeatedly: the headline that mirrors the ad’s exact promise outperforms the headline that restates it in corporate language.

2. A Single, Distraction-Free Focus

No navigation bar. No external links. No footer sitemap. One offer, one path forward.

This sounds obvious. We still audit Facebook landing pages that send paid traffic to a homepage with six navigation items and a footer full of links. Last month we counted eleven exit paths on a page that was spending $4,000 a week in ad budget. Every link that is not the CTA is a leak.

For Facebook traffic specifically, this is worse than for search. The visitor did not choose to be here. They are one thumb-scroll from their feed. Give them exactly one thing to do.

3. Above-the-Fold Social Proof

Cold traffic arrives sceptical. These visitors do not know your brand. They did not ask to see your page. Asking them to fill in a form before they trust you is asking them to leave.

Star ratings, client logos, or a one-line testimonial above the fold change the equation. We stopped debating this years ago. Social proof goes above the fold on every Facebook LP. No exceptions.

We built a Facebook landing page for Spark Advisor, a Medicare insurance FMO. The page led with personas, put trust signals above the fold, and mirrored the Facebook ad creative line for line. The result is below.

4. A Short or Multi-Step Form

For lead generation campaigns, the form is the conversion point. On Facebook landing pages, shorter forms consistently outperform longer ones. Two to three fields above the fold is the starting point.

For more complex offers, multi-step forms reduce psychological friction. The visitor answers one easy question, then another, building commitment through micro-conversions before hitting the fields that feel like work (email, phone number).

We built this for Affordable Health Coverage Today, a US health insurance provider. Their target audience skewed older and less comfortable with long web forms. The landing page auto-detected the visitor’s zip code, state, and city using GeoTargetingWP, so three of the most tedious fields were already filled before anyone typed a character. The page converted at 20%.

5. Mobile-First Layout

Over 80% of Facebook traffic is mobile. Not “we should consider mobile”. Eighty percent. If you designed your page on a 27-inch monitor, you designed it for the minority.

Design for thumb-scroll, not mouse hover. CTA buttons need to be sticky or repeated below the fold. Font sizes need to be readable without pinching. Form fields need to be tap-friendly, which means tall enough that a thumb does not accidentally tap the wrong one.

We design every Facebook LP mobile-first, then adapt for desktop. The reverse approach produces pages that technically work on phones but feel like a desktop site someone left in the dryer.

6. Fast Load Time

A page that takes five seconds to load on a 4G connection loses visitors before they see the headline. Worse, Andromeda sees the bounce, decides the post-click experience is poor, and dials back your ad delivery.

Target under three seconds on mobile. Compress images. Kill the third-party chat widgets, analytics tag managers, and carousel scripts you do not actually need. We have seen a single unnecessary JavaScript file add 1.2 seconds to a client’s load time. That file was a chat widget nobody used.

7. A Clear, Singular Call to Action

One offer. One button. One destination. If the page is long enough to require scrolling, repeat the CTA after every 300 words of body copy.

The CTA copy should match the ad’s promise. If the ad says “Get your free audit”, the button should say “Get My Free Audit”, not “Submit” or “Contact Us”.

Facebook Ads Landing Page Examples

Theory is useful. Numbers from real campaigns are better. These are projects we built, with conversion data we can stand behind.

Spark Advisor — 13.47% Conversion Rate

Spark Advisor needed a landing page specifically for Facebook ad traffic in the Medicare insurance space. The challenge was attracting high-quality leads, not just volume, while building trust with an audience that is naturally sceptical of insurance offers online.

We built a conversion-focused page with the ad’s promise carried through to the headline, above-the-fold social proof from existing clients, and a short lead capture form. The page aligned tightly with the Facebook ad creative, both visually and in messaging.

The result: a 13.47% conversion rate. For context, the cross-industry average for lead generation Facebook campaigns is 7.72% (WordStream, 2025).

See the case studySpark Advisor — Insurance FMO Facebook Landing Page→

Affordable Health Coverage Today — 20% Conversion Rate

Affordable Health needed a landing page for Facebook traffic in a market where the audience skews older. Their visitors were not going to wrestle with a six-field form on a phone screen. Form friction was the conversion killer.

We built a custom page with GeoTargetingWP that auto-detected the visitor’s zip code, state, and city. Three fields filled before anyone typed. The page converted at 20%.

Dan Helinski, the client’s marketing head, said “Apexure is truly a master of their craft” and noted that the team handled complex custom development “with no problems”.

Flare — 65% Conversion Increase

Flare, a B2B SaaS security company, had an underperforming “Book a Demo” page. We redesigned it with a shorter, more focused layout. The streamlined version delivered a 65% increase in conversions within one week.

See the case studyFlare — Book a Demo Landing Page Redesign→

Conversion Rate Benchmarks

Where does your Facebook landing page sit relative to the market?

If you are running lead generation campaigns and converting below 7%, the issue is almost certainly on the landing page, not the ad. The benchmarks show what is achievable when the page is built properly for Facebook traffic.

Facebook Lead Ads vs Landing Page: When to Use Which

Meta offers two paths for lead generation: Lead Ads (in-platform forms) and landing pages (your own domain). Both work, but they solve different problems.

There is one technical constraint that makes this decision easier for some advertisers: Lead Ads cannot capture the fbclid parameter. If your attribution stack depends on passing fbclid through your form to your CRM and into the Conversions API, you need a landing page. Lead Ads bypass your domain entirely, so server-side tracking is limited.

For B2B services and high-ticket offers, we almost always recommend a dedicated landing page over Lead Ads. The quality of leads from a page where visitors read your copy, see your proof, and choose to submit a form is materially higher than leads from a pre-filled form that took two taps.

Tracking Setup: Pixel, CAPI, and UTMs

If you are still relying solely on the Meta Pixel for conversion tracking, you are missing 30-40% of your conversions. Not because they are not happening. Because the Pixel cannot see them.

Three out of four iOS users have opted out of App Tracking Transparency. The Meta Pixel runs in the browser. On those devices, it is blocked or degraded. Your visitor fills in the form, submits their details, becomes a lead, and the Pixel never reports it. Meta’s algorithm sees fewer signals, optimises on incomplete data, and your campaigns get worse over time without you realising why.

The Conversions API (CAPI) fixes this. It sends conversion events server-side, bypassing browser restrictions entirely.

How the Pixel + CAPI dual tracking stack works on a Facebook landing page

The Minimum Viable Tracking Stack

Your landing page needs three things for accurate Facebook ad attribution:

1. Meta Pixel — fires on page load (browser-side). Still useful for page view events and retargeting audiences, even though it under-reports conversions on iOS.

2. Conversions API (CAPI) — fires on form submission (server-side). This is your primary conversion signal. Meta retired the Offline Conversions API in May 2025, so CAPI is now the only server-side reporting path.

3. fbclid capture — when a visitor clicks your Facebook ad, Meta appends a fbclid parameter to the URL. Your landing page form must capture this value (via a hidden field) and pass it to your CRM. This enables your CRM-to-CAPI attribution chain.

UTM Structure

Set your UTM parameters at the ad level:

utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=cpc&utm_campaign={campaign_name}&utm_content={ad_id}

These do not affect Meta’s own reporting, but they are essential for your analytics platform (GA4, Mixpanel, HubSpot) to attribute conversions correctly.

Facebook Ads Policy: What Your Landing Page Must (and Must Not) Include

Meta reviews every ad destination. If your landing page violates policy, your ad gets rejected. If the violation is subtle enough to pass initial review, Andromeda’s semantic matching may still throttle delivery.

What Your Landing Page Must Have

• Functional page — the URL must load, display content, and be navigable. Broken pages, blank pages, and pages behind login walls are rejected.
• Clear offer match — the landing page must deliver what the ad promised. If the ad says “Free consultation”, the page must offer a free consultation.
• Privacy policy — if you collect any personal data through a form, a link to your privacy policy must be visible on the page.

What Gets Your Landing Page Rejected

• Bait-and-switch — ad says one thing, page says another. This accounted for 11% of Meta ad rejections in 2026 (AuditSocials).
• Misleading claims — 19% of rejections. Guaranteed outcomes, fabricated stats, before-and-after images in restricted categories.
• Aggressive pop-ups — pop-ups that block the page content or trigger before the visitor has engaged.
• Auto-downloads — pages that automatically download files to the visitor’s device.
• Data collection without disclosure — harvesting data without a visible privacy policy or consent mechanism.

Restricted Categories

Health, finance, and insurance landing pages face additional scrutiny:

• No language implying guaranteed health outcomes
• No specific financial return promises
• No before-and-after imagery in health/beauty (unless pre-approved)
• No targeting of sensitive personal attributes

Run your ad creative headline through a side-by-side comparison with your landing page H1 before launching. If they do not say essentially the same thing, fix the page or fix the ad.

How to Optimise Your Facebook Landing Page After Launch

Nobody ships a 13% converting page on the first try. Publishing is the start of the optimisation cycle, not the end of the project.

Read Your Heatmaps Before You A/B Test

Before testing a new headline variant, check where attention drops. We had a client who wanted to A/B test their form layout. When we looked at the scroll map, 60% of visitors were not even reaching the form. Testing the layout of something most visitors never see is a waste of a test cycle.

Heatmaps first. Hypothesis second. We start every CRO engagement with Hotjar or Clarity data before writing the first test.

Test One Variable at a Time

The testing priority order we follow for Facebook landing pages:

1. Headline — does it continue the ad’s promise?
2. Hero image or video — does it reinforce the message?
3. Form length — fewer fields, or multi-step?
4. CTA copy — does it match the ad language?
5. Social proof placement — above or below the fold?

For a structured approach to A/B testing, see our landing page A/B testing framework.

Align LP Copy With Your Ad Creative

This is worth repeating because it is the most common failure point we see. Andromeda’s semantic matching system evaluates the consistency between your ad text and your landing page text. If your ad says “Book a free strategy call” and your landing page H1 says “Get in touch with our team”, that is a mismatch. Andromeda will not reject the ad, but it will reduce delivery.

Match the exact language where possible. Match the intent at minimum.

Use CVR Benchmarks to Set Your Baseline

If your Facebook landing page is converting below 7% for lead generation, diagnose before you iterate. Low conversion rates have known causes:

• Traffic-to-offer mismatch (the ad attracts the wrong audience)
• Slow load time (especially on mobile)
• No above-the-fold social proof
• Form is too long or asks for too much too soon
• Headline does not continue the ad’s story

Fix the root cause. Do not test headlines when the real problem is a 6-second load time.

What Is Changing: Facebook Landing Pages in the Andromeda Era

Most guides on Facebook landing pages were written before late 2024. That is when Meta deployed Andromeda, an AI ad retrieval system that is 10,000 times more complex than what came before. Everything written about “best practices” before Andromeda is now incomplete.

LP Quality Is Now a Delivery Variable

Before Andromeda, your landing page affected your conversion rate. Full stop. Now it affects your ad delivery. Andromeda watches bounce rate, time on page, and conversion rate as signals for whether the ad deserves wider distribution. A page that converts well tells the system the ad is good. A page that bounces tells it the ad is bad.

The practical implication: every percentage point of CVR improvement pays you twice. You get more leads from the same traffic, and your CPM drops because Andromeda rewards the improved post-click signal.

CAPI Is the Baseline Tracking Stack

Meta permanently discontinued the Offline Conversions API in May 2025. All server-side conversion tracking now flows through CAPI. Combined with 75% iOS ATT opt-out, the Pixel alone is no longer a viable tracking solution.

Landing pages that do not capture fbclid and fire server-side events through CAPI are flying half-blind. Meta’s algorithm sees fewer conversion signals, optimises on a fraction of the data, and your cost per acquisition creeps up while you wonder what changed.

Advantage+ Sends Colder Traffic

Thirty-five percent of US retail ad spend now flows through Advantage+ campaigns (Dataslayer, 2025). These AI-automated campaigns deliver broader, colder audiences to your landing page. Andromeda sends approximately five fewer purchasers per 1,000 visitors compared to manually targeted campaigns.

This means your landing page must work harder to convert traffic that is less qualified and less familiar with your brand. Above-the-fold social proof, message match, and load speed used to be quality plays. With Advantage+ in the mix, missing any one of them costs the campaign money you cannot easily recover.

First-Party Data Is the Moat

As third-party cookies deprecate and iOS restrictions deepen, landing pages that capture emails, phone numbers, or CRM data at the point of click become the primary asset for future ad retargeting.

A landing page that converts a visitor into a lead gives you a data asset you control. A landing page that fails to convert leaves you renting attention from a retargeting pool that gets smaller every quarter.

Pre-Launch Checklist

Before sending traffic to your Facebook landing page, run through this checklist. We use a version of this for every Facebook LP we ship.

Facebook & Paid Social LP Examples — Built by Apexure

Spark

Medicare SaaS Lead Generation

Boost Health Insurance

Insurance Lead Generation

My Insurance Finder

Insurance Lead Generation

Flare

B2B SaaS Lead Generation

Browse all 300+ examples →

Related Reading

• Paid Search Landing Page Best Practices — how Google Ads landing pages differ from Facebook
• SEO vs PPC Landing Pages — the design differences between organic and paid traffic pages
• Landing Page Conversion Rate Optimisation — 15 CRO tactics that apply to Facebook LPs
• Landing Page Form Design Best Practices — form optimisation for higher conversions
• Lead Generation Landing Pages — examples and strategies for lead capture
• How Landing Pages Affect Quality Score — the LP-to-ad-delivery quality loop
• Landing Page Experiments — 23 A/B tests worth running on your Facebook LP
• CRO Mobile Optimisation Tips — mobile-first optimisation for the 80%+ mobile Facebook audience

Sources 14 Last updated May 2026

View all sources

• Facebook Ads Benchmarks 2025: NEW Data, Trends & Insightswordstream.com
• Facebook Ads Benchmarks by Industry for 2026lebesgue.io
• Average Facebook Ads Conversion Rate 2026influee.co
• Meta Ads Policy Update March 2026: Facebook & Instagram Ad Rule Changesauditsocials.com
• How to Plan Facebook Ads in 2026 — Meta Andromeda Updatenakedmarketing.co
• Meta's AI-Driven Advertising Infrastructure: Inside Andromeda and GEMalmcorp.com
• How to Set Up Meta Conversions API: The Complete 2026 Guidedataally.ai
• Meta Ads CAPI Explained (2026): What It Is, How It Workswetracked.io
• Meta Ads Best Practices 2026: Complete Guide to Advantage+ Shoppingoptifox.in
• Every Meta Ads Change in 2025-2026: Complete Changelogdataslayer.ai
• iOS Privacy Changes: Affecting Ad Tracking Guide 2026cometly.com
• iOS Privacy Changes: Impact on Meta Ad Targetingadamigo.ai
• About Landing Page View Optimization — Meta Business Help Centrefacebook.com
• Meta Andromeda Update 2026: How to Recover ROAS1clickreport.com